top of page

Bibliography

Here, you can find the bibliography. Select the "Read more" link under each letter to expand the list.

For resources relating to each chapter of the textbook, navigate through the "Chapters" pages.

Textbook Bibliography

The bibliography is compiled from resources in each chapter of the text.

0 - 10  ​ 025.431: The Dewey blog: Everything you always wanted to know about the Dewey Decimal Classification® system but were afraid to ask. Retrieved from https://ddc.typepad.com/025431/

A  ​ AACR 2: Background and summary. (1978, October 20). Library of Congress Information Bulletin 37, 640–652. Retrieved from http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015036838459;view=1up;seq=1  ​ Adler, M. (2017). Classification along the color line: Excavating racism in the stacks. Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies, 1(1). Retrieved from http://journals.litwinbooks.com/index.php/jclis/article/view/17  ​ Adler, M., & Harper, L. M. (2018). Race and ethnicity in classification systems: Teaching knowledge organization from a social justice perspective. Library Trends, 67(1), 52–73. doi: 10.1353/lib.2018.0025   ​ Ahn, J., Lin, X., & Khoo, M. (2014). Dewey decimal classification based concept visualization for information retrieval. Knowledge Maps and Information Retrieval Workshop at Digital Libraries’ 2014.  ​ ALA. Cataloging Ethics Steering Committee. (2021). Cataloguing code of ethics. Retrieved from https://alair.ala.org/handle/11213/16716.   ​ ALA. Rainbow Round Table (RRT). Retrieved from https://www.ala.org/rt/rrt  ​ Albanese, A. (2019-06-24). ALA votes to strip Melvil Dewey’s name from its top honor. Publishers Weekly. Retrieved from https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/libraries/article/80557-ala-votes-to-strip-melvil-dewey-s-name-from-its-top-honor.html  ALCTS/CCS/SAC/Subcommittee on Metadata and Classification. (1999). Final report. Retrieved from www.ala.org/alcts/mgrps/camms/cmtes/sac/inact/metadataandclass/metadataclassification  ​ ALCTS/CCS/SAC/Subcommittee on Metadata and Subject Analysis. (1999). Subject data in the metadata record: Recommendations and rationale. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/alcts/resources/org/cat/subjectdata_record  ​ American Library Association, Canadian Federation of Library Associations, and CLIP: Charted Institute of Library and Information Professionals. (2022, June 24). Maps for use with RDA Vocabularies. RDA Registry. Retrieved from http://www.rdaregistry.info/Maps/#isbdrda  ​ American Library Association, Canadian Federation of Library Associations, and CLIP: Charted Institute of Library and Information Professionals. (2020). RDA alignments. RDA Registry. Retrieved from http://www.rdaregistry.info/Aligns/alignISBD2RDA.html  ​ American Library Association, Canadian Library Association, & CILIP: Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals. (2010). RDA toolkit: Resource description and access (17.0). Retrieved from www.rdatoolkit.org  ​ American Library Association, Canadian Library Association, Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (Great Britain), and Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA. (2010). RDA: Resource Description & Access. Available through the RDA Toolkit, https://www.rdatoolkit.org/   ​ American Library Association, Canadian Library Association, Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (Great Britain), & Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA. (2010). RDA: Resource description & access. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.  ​ American National Standards Institute. (1971). American national standard format for bibliographic information interchange on magnetic tape (ANSI Z39.2-1971). New York, NY: ANSI, 1971. [Current edition: National Information Standards Organization. (2014). Information interchange format (ANSI/NISO Z39.2-1994 [R2009])]. Retrieved from http://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/12590/z39-2-1994%28r2009%29.pdf  ​ Anderson, D. (1974). Universal bibliographic control: A long term policy, a plan for action. Pullach/Munich, Germany: Verlag Dokumentation  ​ Anderson, J., & Christensen, K. (2019). Decolonizing attribution: Traditions of exclusion. Journal of Radical Librarianship, 5, 113–152.  ​ Association for Library Collections & Technical Services, Cataloging and Classification Section, Subject Analysis Committee, Subcommittee on the Revision of the Guidelines on Subject Access to Individual Works of Fiction. (2000). Guidelines on subject access to individual works of fiction, drama, etc. (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: American Library Association.  ​ Association for Library Collections & Technical Services, Committee on Cataloging: Description & Access, Task Force on Metadata. (2000, June 16). Final report (CC:DA/TF/Metadata/5). Retrieved from www.libraries.psu.edu/tas/jca/ccda/tf-meta6.html  ​ Attig, J. (1982, June). The USMARC formats—Underlying principles. Information Technology and Libraries, 1(2), 169–174.  ​ Avram, H. D. (1975). MARC: Its history and implications. Washington, DC: Library of Congress; Crawford, W. (1989). MARC for library use: Understanding integrated USMARC. Boston, MA: G. K. Hall & Co.

B  ​ Bakewell, K. G. B. (1972). A manual of cataloguing practice. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press  ​ Batty, D. (1998, November). WWW—Wealth, weariness, or waste: Controlled vocabulary and thesauri in support of online information access. D-Lib Magazine, 4(11). Retrieved from www.dlib.org/dlib/november98/11batty.html  ​ Beghtol, C. (2002). Universal concepts, cultural warrant and cultural hospitality. In M. López-Huertas (Ed.), Advances in knowledge organization: Vol. 8, Ergon-Verlag.  ​ Berman, S. (1977). The cataloging shtik. Library Journal, 102(11), 1251–1253.  ​ Berman, S. (1984). Where have all the Moonies gone? In Gordon Stevenson and Sally Stevenson (Eds.), Reference services and technical services: Interactions in library practice. New York, NY: Haworth Press.  ​ Berman, S. (2014). Prejudices and antipathies: A tract on the LC subject heads concerning people. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Co.  ​ Berman’s papers are available at the ALA Archives: “Sanford Berman Papers, 1933, 1942-1943, 1950-1953, 1959-2013”. ALA Archives.  ​ Bibliographic Framework Initiative. (n.d.). BIBFRAME.org tools. Retrieved from http://bibframe.org/tools/  ​ Bibliographic Framework Initiative. (n.d.). BIBFRAME.org. Retrieved from http://bibframe.org/  ​ Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana (Vatican Library). (1948). Rules for the catalog of printed books. W. E. Wright (Ed.). (The Very Rev. T. J. Shanahan, V. A. Schaefer, & C. T. Vesselowsky, Trans.) Chicago, IL: American Library Association.  ​ BISG. About BISAC. Retrieved from  https://bisg.org/page/PurchaseBISAC#About%20BISAC  ​ BISG. BISAC subject codes FAQ. Retrieved from https://bisg.org/page/BISACFaQ  ​ BISG. Complete BISAC subject headings list, 2019 Edition. Retrieved from   https://bisg.org/page/BISACEdition  ​ Bliss Classification Association. (2007). The Bliss bibliographic classification: History and description. Retrieved from http://www.blissclassification.org.uk/bchist.shtml.   ​ Bliss Classification Association. (2011). The Bliss bibliographic classification. Retrieved from http://www.blissclassification.org.uk/  Bliss, H. E. (1939). The organization of knowledge in libraries (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The H. W. Wilson Company.  Bliss, H. E. (1977- ). Bliss bibliographic classification (2nd ed., edited by J. Mills & V. Broughton, with the assistance of V. Lang). Boston, MA: Butterworths. [See also Bliss Classification Association. (2013). Bliss bibliographic classification: Schedules (2nd ed., edited by J. Mills & V. Broughton). London, UK: Bowker-Saur, 1970-2000; K.G. Saur, 2001–. Retrieved from http://www.blissclassification.org.uk/bcsched.shtml]  Bourne, C. P., & Hahn, T. B. (2003). A history of online information services, 1963-1976. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.  Bristow, B. A. (Ed.), Hugger, M., Spires, K., & Fielder, C. (Assoc. eds.). (2018). Sears list of subject headings (22nd ed.). Ipswich, MA: H. W. Wilson Company. ---For a discussion of these principles, see “Principles of the Sears List,” in Sears List of Subject Headings.  Brown, J. D. (1898). Adjustable classification for libraries, with index. London, UK: Library Supply Company.  Bullard, J. (2022). Libraries in the U.S. and Canada are changing how they refer to indigenous peoples. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/libraries-in-the-u-s-and-canada-are-changing-how-they-refer-to-indigenous-peoples-185106  Bullard, Julia. (2022a). Confusing, inaccurate, and just goofy: Author assessments of ‘Indians of North America’ cataloguing. In Lykke, M., Svarre, T., Haynes, D., Skov, M., Thellefsen, M., & Martínez-Ávila, D. (Eds.). Knowledge organization across disciplines, domains, services, and technologies: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International ISKO Conference, 2022, Aalborg, Denmark. Advances in knowledge organization, no. 19. Baden-Baden: Ergon.  Bush, V. (1945). As we may think. The Atlantic Monthly, 176(1), 101–108. Retrieved from www.theatlantic.com/unbound/flashbks/computer/bushf.htm

C Calhoun, K. (2006). The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools (Prepared for the Library of Congress). Retrieved from www.loc.gov/catdir/calhoun-report-final.pdf Caplan, P. (2003). Metadata fundamentals for all librarians. Chicago, IL: American Library Association. Carpenter, M. (1985). Editor’s introduction: ‘Mr. Panizzi to the Right Hon. the Earl of Ellesmere’. In M. Carpenter & E. Svenonius (Eds.), Foundations of cataloging: A sourcebook. Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited. Carpenter, T. (2022). NISO I/O Gender Identification and Cataloging Practice: Reconsidering Gender in Personal Name Authority Records. Retrieved from https://www.niso.org/niso-io/2022/05/gender-identification-and-cataloging-practice Chan, L. M. (1990). Library of Congress subject headings: Principles of structure and policies for supplication. Washington, DC: Library of Congress. Chan, L. M. (1991). Functions of a subject authority file. In K. M. Drabenstott (Ed.), Subject authorities in the online environment: Papers from a conference program held in San Francisco, June 29, 1987 (ALCTS Papers on Library Technical Services and Collections No. 1). Chicago, IL: American Library Association Chan, L. M. (2001). Exploiting LCSH, LCC, and DDC to retrieve networked resources. In A. M. Sandberg-Fox (Ed.), Proceedings of the bicentennial conference on bibliographic control for the new millennium: Confronting the challenges of networked resources and the web. Washington, DC: Library of Congress Chan, L. M., & O’Neill, E. T. (2010). FAST: Faceted application of subject terminology: Principles and application. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited Chan, L. M., Childress, E., Dean, R., O’Neill, E. T., & Vizine-Goetz, D. (2001). A faceted approach to subject data in the Dublin Core Metadata Record. Journal of Internet Cataloging, 4(1/2), 35– 47 Change the Subject. Directed by Sawyer Broadley and Jill Baron, Dartmouth College, 2019 Change the Subject. Retrieved from https://www.library.dartmouth.edu/digital/digital-collections/change-the-subject Chu, H. (2003). Information representation and retrieval in the digital age. Medford, NJ: Information Today Crawford, W. (1989). MARC for library use: Understanding integrated USMARC. Boston, MA: G. K. Hall & Co. Cutter, C. A. (1891–1893). Expansive classification: Part 1: The first six classifications. Boston, MA: C. A. Cutter Cutter, C. A. (1904). Rules for a dictionary catalog (4th ed. rewritten). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office Cutter, C. A. (1904). Rules for a dictionary catalog (4th ed., rewritten). U. S. Bureau of Education, Special Report on Public Libraries, Part II. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office Cutter, C. A. (1953). Rules for a dictionary catalog (4th ed. rewritten). London, UK: The Library Association. (Original work published 1876) Cutter, C. A., Jones, K. E., Swanson, P. K., & Swift, E. M. (1969). Cutter-Sanborn three-figure author table (Swanson-Swift revision). Chicopee, MA: H. R. Huntting Company Cutter, C. A., Swanson, P. K., & Swift, E. M. (1969). C. A. Cutter’s two-figure author table (Swanson-Swift revision). Chicopee, MA: H. R. Huntting Company.

D DCMI Usage Board. (2020, January 20). DCMI metadata terms. Retrieved from https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/ Dewey, M. (2011). Introduction. In Dewey, M., & Mitchell, J. S. (2011). Dewey decimal classification and relative index (Ed. 23). Dublin, OH: OCLC, Online Computer Library Center, Inc. Dewey, M. (2012). Introduction. In Dewey, M., & Mitchell, J. S. (2012). Abridged Dewey decimal classification and relative index (Ed. 15). Dublin, OH: OCLC, Online Computer Library Center, Inc. Dewey, M., & Mitchell, J. S. (2011). Dewey decimal classification and relative index (Ed. 23). Dublin, OH: OCLC, Online Computer Library Center, Inc. Dewey, M., & Mitchell, J. S. (2012). Abridged Dewey decimal classification and relative index (Ed. 15). Dublin, OH: OCLC, Online Computer Library Center, Inc. Dewey, M., Mitchell, J. S., Beall, J., Green, R., Martin, G., & Panzer, M. (2011). Dewey decimal classification and relative index (Ed. 23). Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. Drabinski, E. (2015). Teaching the radical catalog. In K. R. Roberto (Ed.), Radical cataloging: Essays at the front. McFarland & Company, Inc. Duarte, M. E., & Belarde-Lewis, M. (2015). Imagining: Creating spaces for indigenous ontologies. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 53(5–6), 677–702. doi: 10.1080/01639374.2015.1018396 Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. (2005, November 7). Using Dublin core - Dublin core qualifiers. Retrieved from https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/usageguide/qualifiers/ Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. (2014). History of the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. Retrieved from http://dublincore.org/about/history/ Dublin Core. (2019). Reflections on the DCMI abstract model (2011). Retrieved from https://www.dublincore.org/blog/2011/dcmi_abstract_model Dublin Core. (2020, January 20). DCMI metadata terms, Section 1: Introduction and definitions. Retrieved from https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/#section-1/ Dublin Core. (n.d.). DCMI History. Retrieved from https://www.dublincore.org/about/history/ Dublin Core. (n.d.). Dumb-down principle. Retrieved from https://www.dublincore.org/resources/glossary/dumb-down_principle/ Dudley, M. Q. (2017). A library matter of genocide: The library of congress and the historiography of the native American holocaust. International Indigenous Policy Journal, 8(2). Retrieved from https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/iipj/vol8/iss2/9/ Dunkin, P. S. (1969). Cataloging U.S.A. Chicago, IL: American Library Association Dunn, K. (2017). The National Library of Medicine. In J.D. McDonald & M. Levine-Clark (Eds), Encyclopedia of library and information science (4th ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press

E Ebenezer, C. (2003). Trends in integrated library systems. VINE, 32(4), 19–45. Editeur. (2009). ONIX for books, Release 3.0. Retrieved from https://www.editeur.org/83/Overview/ Editeur. (2009). ONIX for books: Product information format specification, release 3.0. Retrieved from https://www.editeur.org/93/Release-3.0-Downloads/#Specification Ethics Steering Committee. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/view/cataloging-ethics/home

F Ford, A. (June 2018). Bringing harassment out of the history books. American Libraries. American Library Association. Retrieved from https://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/2018/06/01/melvil-dewey-bringing-harassment-out-of-the-history-books/ Foskett, A. C. (1982). The subject approach to information (4th ed.). Hamden, CT: Linnet Books (pp. 409–417). Fox, M. J. (2016). 'Priorities of arrangement’ or a ‘hierarchy of oppressions?’: Perspectives on intersectionality in knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, 43(5), 373–383. doi: 10.5771/0943-7444-2016-5 Fox, V. The Cataloging Lab. Retrieved from https://cataloginglab.org/ Freedman, M. J. (1977). Public libraries, the Library of Congress, and the National Bibliographic Network. Library Journal, 102(19), 2211–2219. Frick, R. L., & Proffitt, M. (2022). Reimagine descriptive workflows: A community-informed agenda for reparative and inclusive descriptive practice agenda for reparative and inclusive descriptive practice. OCLC. Retrieved from https://oc.lc/reimagine-workflows-report Furner, J. (2007). Dewey deracialized: A critical race-theoretic perspective. Knowledge Organization, 34(3), 144–168.

G Garber, S. (2007, October 10). Sputnik and the dawn of the space age. Retrieved from http://history.nasa.gov/sputnik/ Gender and Sexuality Funnel Project. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/saco/gender-sexuality-funnel.html Godby, C. J. (2012). A crosswalk from ONIX version 3.0 for books to MARC 21. Dublin, OH: OCLC Research. Retrieved from http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/library/2012/2012-04.pdf Golub, K., Hagelbäck, J., & Ardö, A. (2018). Automatic classification using DDC on the Swedish Union Catalogue. In 18th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems Workshop (NKOS 2018), Porto, Portugal, September 13 (pp. 4–16). Google. (2022). Google Books. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/ Gorman, M. (1989). AACR2R: Editor’s perspective. Library Resources & Technical Services, 33(2), 181–186. Gorman, M., & Hotsinpiller, J. (1979). ISBD: Aid or barrier to understanding? College & Research Libraries, 40(6), 519–526. Green, R. (2015). Indigenous peoples in the US, Sovereign nations, and the DDC. Knowledge Organization, 42(4), 211–221. doi: 10.5771/0943-7444-2015-4-211. Gross, T., & Fox, V.B. (2019). Authority work as outreach. In Jane Sandberg. (Ed.), Ethical questions in name authority control (pp. 335–348). Sacramento: Library Juice Press. Retrieved from https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/lrs_facpubs/65/ Gullion, S. L. (1983). Cataloging and classification: Classification and subject cataloging. In L. Darling, D. Bishop, & L. A. Colaianni (Eds.), Handbook of medical library practice (4th ed.). Chicago, IL: Medical Library Association.

H Hahn, T. B. (1998). Pioneers of the online age. In T. B. Hahn & M. Buckland (Eds.), Historical studies in information science (pp. 116–131). Medford, NJ: Information Today. Hajibayova, L., & Salaba, A. (2018). Critical questions for big data approach in knowledge representation and organization. In Ribeiro, Fernanda, & Cerveira, Maria Elisa (Eds.), Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018 Porto, Portugal. Advances in knowledge organization, no. 16. Baden-Baden: Ergon (pp.144–151). Hanson, J. C. M. (1929). The Library of Congress and its new catalogue: Some unwritten history. In W. W. Bishop & A. Keogh (Eds.), Essays offered to Herbert Putnam by his colleagues and friends on his thirtieth anniversary as Librarian of Congress: 5 April 1929. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press (pp. 186–187). Hardy, Q. (2006, March/April). Can we know everything? California [UC Berkeley Alumni Magazine], 117(2). Retrieved from http://alumni.berkeley.edu/california-magazine/march-april-2006-can-we-know-everything/can-we-know-everything Harold, E. R., & Means, W. S. (2004). XML in a nutshell (3rd ed.). Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly (pp. 4, 6). Hauben, M., & Hauben, R. (1998). Behind the Net: The untold history of the ARPANET and computer science. First Monday, 8(3). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/index Higgins, M. (2016). Totally invisible: Asian American representation in the Dewey decimal classification, 1876–1996. Knowledge Organization, 43(8), 609–621. Hillmann, D. (2005, November 7). Using Dublin core. Retrieved from http://dublincore.org/documents/2005/11/07/usageguide/ Hjørland, B. (2017). Classification. Knowledge Organization, 44(2), 97–128. Also available in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, eds. Birger Hjørland and Claudio Gnoli, http://www.isko.org/cyclo/classification Howard, S. A., & Knowlton, S. A. Browsing through bias: The library of congress classification and subject headings for African American studies and LGBTQIA studies. Library Trends, 67(1), 74–88. doi: 10.1353/lib.2018.0026 Howarth, L. C., & Jansen, E. H. (2014). Towards a typology of warrant for 21st century knowledge organization systems. In Babik, Wieslaw (Ed.). Knowledge organization in the 21st century: Between historical patterns and future prospects: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014 Kraków, Poland. Advances in knowledge organization, no. 14. Baden-Baden: Ergon (pp. 216–221). Hughes-Watkins, L. (2018). Moving toward a reparative archive: A roadmap for a holistic approach to disrupting homogenous histories in academic repositories and creating inclusive spaces for marginalized voices. Journal of Contemporary Archival Studies, 5(6). Retrieved from https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/jcas/vol5/iss1/6

I Idrees, H. (2013). Organization of Islamic knowledge in libraries: The role of classification systems. Library Philosophy and Practice, 63(3), 98-117. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/798 IFLA Cataloguing Section and IFLA Meetings of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code. (2016, revised 2017). Statement of International Cataloguing Principles (ICP). Retrieved from https://www.ifla.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/assets/cataloguing/icp/icp_2016-en.pdf IFLA Cataloguing Section and IFLA Meetings of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code. (2009). Statement of international cataloguing principles. München, Germany: K. G. Saur. Retrieved from http://www.ifla.org/publications/statement-of-international-cataloguing-principles IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) Review Group. (2018). IFLA library reference model: A conceptual model for bibliographic information. Retrieved from https://repository.ifla.org/handle/123456789/40 IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. (1998). Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final report (UBCIM Publications, New Series Vol. 19). München, Germany: K. G. Saur. Retrieved from http://www.ifla.org/publications/functional-requirements-for-bibliographic-records IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. (2009). Functional requirements for bibliographic records, Final report. München, Germany: K. G. Saur. Retrieved from http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf IFLA Working Group on Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records (FRANAR), International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. (2013). Functional requirements for authority data: A conceptual model. München, Germany: K. G. Saur. Retrieved from http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frad/frad_2013.pdf IFLA Working Group on the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Records (FRSAR), International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. (2011). Functional requirements for subject authority data (FRSAD): A conceptual model. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Saur. Retrieved from http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/classification-and-indexing/functional-requirements-for-subject-authority-data/frsad-final-report.pdf International Committee for Documentation (CIDOC). (n.d.). Conceptual reference model (CRM). Retrieved from https://www.cidoc-crm.org/ International Conference on Cataloguing Principles. (1961). Statement of principles adopted by the International Conference on Cataloguing Principles. Retrieved from http://www.nl.go.kr/icc/paper/20.pdf International standard bibliographic description: 2021 update to the 2011 consolidated edition. Retrieved from https://repository.ifla.org/bitstream/ 123456789/1939/1/ISBD_Update%202021%20to%20Consolidated%20ed%202011.pdf International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. (2022, May 25). Release of the 2021 Update to the 2011 Consolidated Edition of the ISBD. Retrieved from https://www.ifla.org/news/release-of-the-2021-update-to-the-2011-consolidated-edition-of-the-isbd/ International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. (1996). Names of persons: National usages for entry in catalogues (4th revised and enlarged ed., UBCIM Publication—New Series Vol. 16). München, Germany: K. G. Saur. International Federation of Library Associations. (1974). ISBD (M): International Standard Bibliographic Description for Monographic publications (1st standard ed.). London, UK: IFLA Committee on Cataloguing. [And subsequent editions.] International Organization for Standardization. (1973). Documentation: Format for bibliographic information interchange on magnetic tape: ISO 2709. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; current edition: International Organization for Standardization. (2011). Information and documentation: Format for information exchange: ISO 2709:2008. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization. Intner, S. S., Lazinger, S. S., & Weihs, J. (2006). Metadata and its impact on libraries. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited. ISNI. (2021). Representation of gender identities in ISNI records and the ISNI database. Retrieved from https://isni.org/page/article-detail/isni-press-release-august-2021-representation-of-gender-identities-in-isni-records-and-the-isni-database/

J J. Paul Getty Trust. (2018). Art & architecture thesaurus online: About the AAT. Retrieved from https://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies/aat/about.html J. Paul Getty Trust. (2019). Getty thesaurus of geographic names online. Retrieved from http://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies/tgn/ J. Paul Getty Trust. (2019). Getty vocabularies. Retrieved from http://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies/ Jacob, E. K. (2004). Classification and categorization: A difference that makes a difference. Library Trends, 52(3), 515–540 Jensen, K. (15 November 2021). Library of Congress subject heading change doesn't address the real issue. Book Riot. Retrieved from https://bookriot.com/library-of-congress-subject-heading-change/ Jewett, C. C. (1961). Smithsonian report on the construction of catalogues of libraries, and their publication by means of separate, stereotyped titles, with rules and examples (2nd. ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms. (Original work published 1853) Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA. (n.d.). RDA: Resource Description and Access: Background. Retrieved from http://www.rda-jsc.org/rda.html#background Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR (A committee of the American Library Association, the Australian Committee on Cataloguing, the British Library, the Canadian Committee on Cataloguing, Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals, and the Library of Congress). (2002). Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: American Library Association Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR, American Library Association, Canadian Library Association, and Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (Great Britain). (2002). Anglo American cataloguing rules (2nd ed., 2002 revision). Chicago, IL: American Library Association (pp. 14–15) Joudrey, D. N., Taylor, A. G., & Wisser, K. M. (2017). The organization of information (4th ed.). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.

K Kanellos, M. (2006, September 11). The hard drive at 50: Half a century of hard drives, CNET News.com. Retrieved from http://www.zdnet.com/news/a-half-century-of-hard-drives/149491 Kilgour, F. G. (1977). Ohio College Library Center. In A. Kent, H. Lancour, & J. E. Daily (Eds.), Encyclopedia of library and information science (Vol. 20, pp. 346–347). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker Knight, F. T. (2019). Words and worldviews: decolonizing description. Librarian Publications & Presentations, 29. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/librarians/29 Knowlton, S. A. (2005). Three decades since prejudices and antipathies: A study of changes in the library of congress subject headings. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 40(2), 123–145 Koch, T. (1999). The role of classification schemes in Internet resource description and discovery. Retrieved from http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/desire/classification/index.html Korfhage, R. R. (1997). The matching process. In Information Storage and Retrieval. New York: Wiley (pp. 79–104)

L LaMontagne, L. E. (1961). American library classification with special reference to the Library of Congress. Hamden, CT: Shoe String Press Latin American and Indigenous Peoples of the Americas Funnel Project. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/saco/laipafun.html Laughead, G., Jr. (2008). WWW-VL: History: Internet & W3 World-Wide Web. Retrieved from http://vlib.iue.it/history/internet/ LC-PCC policy statements for gender [RDA Toolkit]. Retrieved from https://access.rdatoolkit.org/en-US_ala-1e50ce22-a349-3bbe-8ff8-2a7bdccbaef1/ala-1e50ce22-a349-3bbe-8ff8-2a7bdccbaef1 Lehnus, D. J. (1980). Book numbers: History, principles, and application. Chicago, IL: American Library Association Library of Congress (2022). BIBFRAME January 2022 update forum. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/news/bibframe-update-mw2022.html Library of Congress & National Library of Canada. (1999). MARC 21 format for authority data: Including guidelines for content designation. Washington, DC: Cataloging Distribution Service, Library of Congress Library of Congress & National Library of Canada. (2000). MARC 21 format for classification data: Including guidelines for content designation. Washington, DC: Cataloging Distribution Service, Library of Congress Library of Congress, Catalog Division. (1910–1914). Subject headings used in the dictionary catalogues of the Library of Congress. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, Library Branch Library of Congress, Cataloging Policy and Support Office. (1989). Free-floating subdivisions: An alphabetical index. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, Cataloging Distribution Service Library of Congress, Library and Archives Canada, British Library, & National Library of Canada. (2000). MARC 21 format for holdings data: Including guidelines for content designation. Washington, DC: Cataloging Distribution Service, Library of Congress Library of Congress, Library and Archives Canada, National Library of Canada, & British Library. (1999- ). MARC 21 format for bibliographic data: Including guidelines for content designation. Washington, DC: Cataloging Distribution Service, Library of Congress Library of Congress, Network Development and MARC Standards Office. (2008, April 7). MARC Code list for geographic areas. Retrieved from www.loc.gov/marc/geoareas/gacshome.html Library of Congress, Network Development and MARC Standards Office. (1999). MARC 21 format for authority data: Including guidelines for content designation. Washington, DC: Cataloging Distribution Service, Library of Congress Library of Congress, Subject Cataloging Division. (1984). Subject cataloging manual: Subject headings (prelim. ed.). Washington, DC: Library of Congress Library of Congress. (1974–1983). Library of Congress name headings with references. Washington, DC: Library of Congress Library of Congress. (2000). MARC 21 specifications for record structure, character sets, and exchange media. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/marc/specifications/spechome.html Library of Congress. (2002a, December). Development of the encoded archival description DTD. Retrieved from www.loc.gov/ead/eaddev.html Library of Congress. (2002b). Encoded archival description: Version 2002. Retrieved from www.loc.gov/ead/ Library of Congress. (2002c). Encoded archival description tag library, Version 2002. Appendix C: Encoded examples. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/ead/tglib/appendix_ca.html Library of Congress. (2007, October). MARC code list for languages (2007 ed.). Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/marc/languages/langhome.html Library of Congress. (2012, November 21). Bibliographic framework as a web of data: Linked data model and supporting services. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/pdf/marcld-report-11-21-2012.pdf Library of Congress. (2013a). G055: Call numbers. In Classification and shelflisting manual. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/aba/publications/FreeCSM/G055.pdf Library of Congress. (2013b). G302: U.S. states and Canadian provinces. In Classification and shelflisting manual. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/aba/publications/FreeCSM/G302.pdf Library of Congress. (2013c). G320: Biography. In Classification and shelflisting manual. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/aba/publications/FreeCSM/G320.pdf Library of Congress. (2014a). Classification and shelflisting manual. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/aba/publications/FreeCSM/freecsm.html Library of Congress. (2014b). G300: Regions and countries table. In Classification and shelflisting manual. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/aba/publications/FreeCSM/G300.pdf Library of Congress. (2016). Library of Congress authorities. Retrieved from http://authorities.loc.gov Library of Congress. (2019, December 9). PCC and the BIBFRAME model. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/documents/bibframe-pcc.html/ Library of Congress. (2022, February 2). MARCXML Schema & Documentation. Retrieved from www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/ Library of Congress. (2022). Demographic group terms. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/aba/publications/FreeLCDGT/freelcdgt.html Library of Congress. (n.d.) MARC distribution services (data set). Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/cds/products/marcDist.php Library of Congress. (n.d.). Bibframe frequently asked questions. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/faqs/ Library of Congress. (n.d.). MODS: Metadata object description schema. Retrieved from www.loc.gov/standards/mods/ Library of Congress. BIBFRAME 2.0 to MARC 21 conversion specifications. Retrieved from https://loc.gov/bibframe/bftm/index.html Library of Congress. Bibliographic Framework Initiative. Retrieved from https://loc.gov/bibframe/ Library of Congress. Library of Congress Demographic Group Terms. L400. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/aba/publications/FreeLCDGT/freelcdgt.html Library of Congress. Policy and Standards Division. (2008). Subject headings manual. Washington, DC: Library of Congress. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/aba/publications/FreeSHM/freeshmabout.html Library of Congress. Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC) Ad Hoc Task Group on Gender in Name Authority Records. (2022). PCC Task Group in Gender. Retrieved from https://loc.gov/aba/pcc/taskgroup/TG-on-Gender-charge.pdf Lin, X., Khoo, M., Ahn, J., Tudhope, D., Binding, C., Massam, D., & Jones, H. (2017). Mapping metadata to DDC classification structures for searching and browsing. International Journal On Digital Libraries, 18(1), 25–39 Littletree, S., & Metoyer, C. (2015). “Knowledge Organization from an indigenous perspective: The Mashantucket Pequot Thesaurus of American Indian Terminology Project. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53(5–6), 640–657. doi: 10.1080/01639374.2015.1010113 Lubetzky, S. (1960). Code of cataloging rules: Author and title entry. Chicago, IL: American Library Association Lubetzky, S. (1969). Principles of cataloging. Final report. Phase I: Descriptive cataloging. Los Angeles, CA: Institute of Library Research, University of California Lubetzky, S. (1985). Principles of descriptive cataloging. In M. Carpenter & E. Svenonius (Eds.), Foundations of cataloging: A sourcebook (pp. 104–112). Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited. (Original work published 1946) Lubetzky, S. (2001). Cataloging rules and principles: A critique of the A.L.A. rules for entry and a proposed design for their revision. In E. Svenonius & D. McGarry (Eds.), Seymour Lubetzky: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (pp. 78–139). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited. (Original work published 1953).

M Mai, J.-E. (2003). The future of general classification. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 37(1/2), 3–12 Mai, J.-E. (2010). Classification in a social world: bias and trust. Journal of Documentation, 66(5), 627–642 Mai, J.-E. (2013). Ethics, values and morality in contemporary library classifications. Knowledge Organization, 40(4), 242–253 Maltby, A. (1975). Sayers’ manual of classification for librarians (5th ed.). London, UK: Andre Deutsch (p. 121). [Note: John Phillip Comaromi, on the other hand, argued that Hegel provided the philosophic underpinnings of Harris’s and Dewey’s classification systems.] [Comaromi, J. P. (1976). The eighteen editions of the Dewey decimal classification. Albany, NY: Forest Press Division, Lake Placid Education Foundation (p. 29).] MARC Development Office, Library of Congress. (1974). Information on the MARC system (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Library of Congress Martínez-Ávila, D., Semidão, R., & Ferreira, M. (2016). Methodological aspects of critical theories in knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, 43(2), 118–125 Martínez-Ávila, D. (2016). “BISAC Subject Headings List”. Knowledge Organization 43(8), 655–662. Also available in ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, eds. Birger Hjørland and Claudio Gnoli, https://www.isko.org/cyclo/bisac Maxwell, M. F. (1989). AACR2R: Anglo-American cataloguing rules. Library Resources & Technical Services, 33(2), 179–181. McCallum, J. C. (2022, May 15). Disk drive prices. Retrieved from https://jcmit.net/diskprice.htm McIlwaine, I. C. (1990). The work of the system development task force. In A. Gilchrist & D. Strachan (Eds.), The UDC: Essays for a new decade (pp. 19–27). London, UK: Aslib. McIlwaine, I. C. (2000). The universal decimal classification: A guide to its use. The Hague, Netherlands: UDC Consortium (Chapter 1) McKiernan, G. (1995). CyberStacks(sm): A ‘Library-Organized’ virtual science and technology reference collection. Reference and Instruction Publications and Papers. 29. Retrieved from https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/refinst_pubs/29 Meadow, C. (1988). Online database industry timeline. Database, 11(5), 23–31. Retrieved from http://www.infotoday.com/ Mehnert, R., & Hoffmann, C. F. B. (1986). The National Library of Medicine. In A. Kent (Ed.), Encyclopedia of library and information science (Vol. 41, Supp. 6). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker. Merrill, W. S. (1939). Code for classifiers (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: American Library Association (pp. 3–7). Mills, J. (1967). A modern outline of library classification. London, UK: Chapman & Hall, Ltd. (pp. 89–102) Mills, J. (1976, Spring). The new Bliss classification. Catalogue and Index, 40(1), 3–6 Mowery, R. L. (1976, Spring). The Cutter classification: Still at work. Library Resources and Technical Services, 20, 154–156 Music Library Association. (2011). Thematic indexes used in the Library of Congress/NACO authority file. Retrieved from http://bcc.musiclibraryassoc.org/BCC-Historical/BCC2011/Thematic_Indexes.htm

N Name Change Policy Working Group. Retrieved from https://ncpwg.org/ National Center for Biotechnology Information. (2013). The NCBI handbook (2nd ed.). Bethesda, MD: National Center for Biotechnology Information. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK143764/ National Information Standards Organization. (2013). The Dublin core metadata element set. Retrieved from https://www.niso.org/publications/ansiniso-z3985-2012-dublin-core-metadata-element-set National Library of Medicine (U.S.). (1999). National Library of Medicine classification: A scheme for the shelf arrangement of library materials in the field of medicine and its related sciences (5th ed., revised). NIH Publication no. 00-1535. Bethesda, MD: National Library of Medicine National Library of Medicine (U.S.). (2014a, September 8). Medical subject headings. Retrieved from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh National Library of Medicine (U.S.). (2014b, April 29). NLM classification. Retrieved from www.nlm.nih.gov/class/ National Library of Medicine (U.S.). (2014c, April 29). NLM classification practices: Serial publications. Retrieved from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/class/nlmclassprac.html#Serial National Library of Medicine (U.S.). (2014d, April 29). NLM classification practices: Early printed books. Retrieved from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/class/nlmclassprac.html#Early National Library of Medicine (U.S.). (2018a). Medical subject headings. Retrieved from https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/ National Library of Medicine (U.S.). (2018b). Medical subject headings: Preface. Retrieved from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/intro_preface.html National Library of Medicine (U.S.). (2018c). Medical subject headings: MeSH tree structures. Retrieved from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/intro_trees.html National Library of Medicine (U.S.). (2018e). Medical subject headings: MeSH qualifiers by allowable category -- 2018. Retrieved from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/topcat.html National Library of Medicine (U.S.). (2018f). Medical subject headings: Publication characteristics (publication types) with scope notes – 2019 MeSH pubtypes. Retrieved from www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/pubtypes.html National Library of Medicine (U.S.). (2018h). Medical subject headings: Use of medical subject headings for cataloging. Retrieved from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/catpractices.html Network Development and MARC Standards Office, Library of Congress. (2012). MARC 21 concise formats. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/marc/concise and https://www.loc.gov/marc/marcdocz.html Network Development and MARC Standards Office, Library of Congress. (n.d.). MARCXML: MARC 21 XML schema. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/ Network Development and MARC Standards Office, Library of Congress. (n.d.). MODS: Metadata object description scheme. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/ Network Development and MARC Standards Office, Library of Congress. (2016). MADS: Metadata authority description schema. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/standards/mads/ Network Development and MARC Standards Office, Library of Congress. (2005, May 3). ONIX to MARC 21 mapping. Retrieved from www.loc.gov/marc/onix2marc.html

O O’Neill, E. T., & Chan, L. M. (2003). “FAST (faceted application of subject terminology): A simplified vocabulary based on the Library of Congress subject headings. IFLA Journal, 29(4), 336–342. OCLC Research. (1998). FAST (faceted application of subject terminology). Retrieved from http://fast.oclc.org/ OCLC, Online Computer Library Center. (2011). Webdewey [Subscription service]. Available from www.dewey.org/webdewey/ OCLC, Online Computer Library Center. (2014). Dewey Cutter program [Software program]. Available from http://www.oclc.org/support/services/dewey/program.en.html [See also: Comaromi, J. P. (1981). Book numbers: A historical study and practical guide to their use. Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited.] OCLC. (2022). History of the OCLC research library partnership. Retrieved from http://www.oclc.org/research/partnership/history.html OCLC. (2022). Partners support libraries and WorldCat growth. Retrieved from https://www.oclc.org/en/worldcat/partners.html OCLC. (n.d.) OCLC-MARC records: Record structure. Retrieved from http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/support/worldcat/documentation/records/subscription/1/1.pdf OCLC. Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) Editorial Policy Committee (EPC). Retrieved from https://www.oclc.org/en/dewey/resources/epc.html Olson, H. A. (1999). Exclusivity, teleology and hierarchy: our Aristotelian legacy. Knowledge Organization, 26(2), 65–73. Olson, H. A. (2000). Difference, culture and change: The untapped potential of LCSH. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 29(1–2), 53–71 Olson, H. A. (2002). The power to name: Locating the limits of subject representation in libraries. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Online Computer Library Center. (2022). Inside WorldCat. Retrieved from https://www.oclc.org/en/worldcat/inside-worldcat.html Online Computer Library Center. (2022). OCLC World Cat. Retrieved from www.oclc.org/worldcat/open/ Osborn, A. D. (1941, October). The crisis in cataloging. Library Quarterly, 11(4), 393–411. Available from http://www.jstor.org/

P Panizzi, A. (1985). Mr. Panizzi to the Right Hon. the Earl of Ellesmere--British Museum, January 29, 1848. In M. Carpenter & E. Svenonius (Eds.), Foundations of cataloging: A sourcebook (pp. 18–47). Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited. (Original work published 1850) Panizzi, A. (1985). Rules for the compilation of the catalogue. In M. Carpenter & E. Svenonius (Eds.), Foundations of cataloging: A sourcebook (pp. 3–14). Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited. (Original work published 1841) Parent, M. (2021, December 2). A primer on RDA application profiles. Retrieved from https://www.rdatoolkit.org/node/256 Patton, G. E. (2009). Functional requirements for authority data: A conceptual model (IFLA Series on Bibliographic Control Vol. 34). München, Germany: K. G. Saur. Retrieved from http://www.ifla.org/publications/functional-requirements-for-authority-data PCC Ad Hoc Task Group on Recording Gender in Personal Name Authority Records. (2022). Revised Report on Recording Gender in Personal Name Authority Records, April 7, 2022. https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/documents/gender-in-NARs-revised-report.pdf PCC SACO Funnel Projects. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/saco/funnelsaco.html PCC Standing Committee on Training (SCT). (2015). Training Manual for Applying Relationship Designators in Bibliographic Records. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/sct/documents/rel-desig-guide-bib.pdf Pettee, J. (1947). Subject headings: The history and theory of the alphabetical subject approach to books. New York, NY: H. W. Wilson Company Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC) Ad Hoc Task Group on Recording Gender in Personal Name Authority Records. (2016). Report of the PCC Ad Hoc Task Group on Gender in Name Authority Records, October 4, 2016. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/documents/Gender_375%20field_RecommendationReport.pdf Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC). (n.d.). About the PCC. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/about/ Program for Cooperative Cataloging. (2014) PCC guidelines for the application of relationship designators in bibliographic records. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/rda/PCC%20RDA%20guidelines/Relat-Desig-Guidelines.docx

Q Queer Metadata Collective. Retrieved from https://queermetadatacollective.org/

R Ranganathan, S. R. (1963). Colon classification (6th ed., reprinted with amendments). Mumbai, India: Asia Publishing House Ranganathan, S. R. (1987). Colon classification (7th ed., revised and edited by M. A. Gopinath). Bangalore, India: Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science. [cf. Dhyani, P. (1988). Colon classification edition 7—An appraisal. International Classification, 15(1), 13.] Ranganathan, S. R., assisted by M. A. Gopinath. (1967). Prolegomena to library classification (3rd ed.). London, UK: Asia Publishing House RDA Board. (n.d.). Strategic plan for RDA 2020-2022. Retrieved from http://www.rda-rsc.org/strategicplan20-22 RDA Steering Committee. (2022). RDA FAQ. Retrieved from http://rda-rsc.org/content/rda_faq RDA Toolkit 3R Project. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.rdatoolkit.org/3RProject RDA Toolkit Instruction Identification. (2018, July 30). Retrieved from http://www.rda-rsc.org/sites/all/files/RDA%20Toolkit%20Instruction%20Identification.pdf RDA Toolkit. (2010). RDA background. Retrieved from http://www.rdatoolkit.org/background RDA Toolkit. (n.d.) Glossary. Retrieved from https://access.rdatoolkit.org/Glossary RDA: Resource description and access. (2010–2017, original version). Developed in a collaborative process led by the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA (JSC). Chicago: American Library Association. Retrieved from https://original.rdatoolkit.org RDA: Resource description and access. (2019). Developed in a collaborative process led by the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA (JSC). Chicago: American Library Association. Reitz, J. M. (2004-2014). ODLIS: Online dictionary for library and information science. Retrieved from http://products.abc-clio.com/ODLIS/odlis_about Richmond, P. (1981). Introduction to PRECIS for North American usage. Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited Riley, J., & National Information Standards Organization (U.S.). (2017). Understanding metadata: What is metadata, and what is it for?: A primer. Bethesda, MD: NISO Press. Retrieved from https://www.niso.org/publications/understanding-metadata-2017 Riva, P., LeBoeuf, P., and Žumer, M. (2017). IFLA library reference model. Retrieved from https://repository.ifla.org/bitstream/123456789/40/1/ifla-lrm-august-2017_rev201712.pdf RSC. RDA Steering Committee. (2021). 3R project final report. http://www.rda-rsc.org/sites/all/files/3R%20Project%20Final%20Report.pdf

S SACO African American Funnel Project. Retrieved form https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/saco/aframerfun.html Slavic, A. (2004). UDC translations: A 2004 survey report and bibliography. Extensions and Corrections to the UDC, 26, 58–80 Smiraglia, R. P. (2012). Epistemology of domain analysis. In R. P. Smiraglia & H.-L. Lee (Eds.), Cultural frames of knowledge (pp. 111–124). Würzburg: Ergon-Verlag Society of American Archivists. (1989). Archives, personal papers, and manuscripts (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: Society of American Archivists Society of American Archivists. (2007). Describing archives: A content standard. Chicago, IL: Society of American Archivists Svenonius, E. (1990). Design of controlled vocabularies. In A. Kent (Ed.), Encyclopedia of library and information science (Vol. 45, Supp. 10, p. 88). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker Svenonius, E. Editor’s introduction: ‘Smithsonian catalogue system [by] Charles C. Jewett’. In M. Carpenter & E. Svenonius (Eds.), Foundations of cataloging: A sourcebook (p. 49). Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited

T Taube, M. (1952, October). Specificity in subject headings and coordinate indexing. Library Trends, 1, 222 Technical Subcommittee for Encoded Archival Standards of the Society of American Archivists. (2019). Encoded archival description tag library version EAD3 1.1.1. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/ead/EAD3taglib/EAD3-TL-eng.html Tedd, L. (1994). OPACs through the ages. Library Review, 43(4), 27–37. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/loi/lr Text Encoding Initiative. (2022, April 19). Example: (TEI Header). Retrieved from http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/examples-teiHeader.html Tillett, B. B. (2003). FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records). Technicalities, 23(5), 1, 11–13. Retrieved from: www.loc.gov/cds/FRBR.html

U UDC Consortium. (2015a). International UDC seminar 2015: Classification and authority control. Retrieved from www.udcc.org UDC Consortium. (2015b). UDC online. Retrieved from http://www.udc-hub.com/ United States Army Medical Library. (1951). Army medical library classification: Medicine. Pre-clinical sciences: QS-QZ, Medicine and related subjects: W (1st ed.). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office

V Visual Resources Association Data Standards Committee. (2007, April 5). VRA core 4.0 element description and tagging examples. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/standards/vracore/ Visual Resources Association Data Standards Committee. (2007). VRA core cataloging examples. Retrieved from https://core.vraweb.org/vracore_examplesall.html Vizine-Goetz, D. (1999). Using library classification schemes for Internet resources. OCLC Internet Cataloging Project Colloquium Position Paper. Retrieved from http://staff.oclc.org/~vizine/Intercat/vizine-goetz.htm

W Waldhart, T. J., Miller, J. B., & Chan, L. M. (2000). Provision of local assisted access to selected internet information resources by ARL academic libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 26(2), 100–109 WebCrawler. (2006). About WebCrawler. Retrieved from www.webcrawler.com/info.wbcrwl/search/help/about.htm Wiegand, W.A. (1996). Irrepressible reformer: A biography of Melvil Dewey. Chicago: American Library Association. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). (2021, December 13). Simple knowledge organization system (SKOS). Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/ World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). (2016, October 11). Extensible markup language (XML). Retrieved from www.w3.org/XML/

Z Zeng, M. L., & Qin, J. (2022). Metadata (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Neal-Schuman Publishers. Zeng, M. L., Žumer, M., & Salaba, A. (Eds.). (2011). Functional requirements for subject authority data (FRSAD): A conceptual model (IFLA Series on Bibliographic Control Vol. 43). Berlin/München, Germany: De Gruyter Saur. Retrieved from http://www.ifla.org/publications/ifla-series-on-bibliographic-control-43 Zeng, M. L. (2019). Interoperability. Knowledge Organization, 46(2), 122–146. Žumer, M. (2018). IFLA library reference model (IFLA LRM): Harmonisation of the FRBR family. Knowledge Organization 45(4), 310–318. Also available in Hjørland, Birger and Gnoli, Claudio eds., ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, http://https://www.isko.org/cyclo/lrm

bottom of page